Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:28 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Dec 2, 2012 at 11:32 vote accept Ambo100Mod
May 5, 2012 at 4:45 comment added Joubarc Mod To which I fully agree, but then again, why not apply the same reasoning to the other sites?
May 4, 2012 at 17:31 comment added Robert Cartaino @Joubarc ...and that's Shog's main point. A valuable contribution to the Internet doesn't necessarily have to be one that's growing at breakneck speeds. Hypothetically, we could have a microscopically small site which only receives a question on the rarest of occasions. But if those questions get good answers, and the current content is well maintained, the site should be able to go on forever. I'm not ceding that LEGO SE will remain microscopically small, but even if that becomes the case, our thinking is these sites continue to provide a good contribution to the Internet; let 'em be.
Apr 26, 2012 at 7:45 comment added Joubarc Mod Also, the blog post says But when a site struggles to maintain any semblance of steady progress, and I don't think we fall in that category yet. Our progress is slow, granted, but it IS there. Just look at the new users registrations, and you'll notice that, given time, we'll probably start faring better on the third criteria (# users), and then hopefully on the rest.
Apr 26, 2012 at 7:37 comment added Joubarc Mod (singing) There's a zombie on your lawn... I'm fairly confident we can keep the lawn clean for the foreseeable future, and if it begins to grow wild, maybe it'll be a sign that the activity has improved much.
Apr 26, 2012 at 1:47 comment added nhinkle I'm glad you've spared Lego for now. It's the sort of site that has a lot of potential, but just doesn't quite have the audience yet. I'll certainly do what I can to help keep the grass mowed.
Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 history answered Shog9 CC BY-SA 3.0