3

While reviewing suggested edits I came across this. Nothing wrong with the tag wiki edit (though I'm skipping in the meantime) but it's for a tag called , with 29 uses currently.

Is this tag really necessary? Usually we distinguish other systems from bricks, not the other way around, since the overwhelming majority of questions are about bricks, as implied by the name of the site.

3

This tag does not seem to add anything to the questions, many of these questions use or which describe the questions well enough.

Only two questions used this tag alone, I have re-tagged with other more appropriate tags and removed all references to this tag on every other question.

4

I know I am a new user here and even made that wiki excerpt myself but when I think about tag, it seems useless to me. It's like having a tag in Movies & TV stack exchange. I will say we should get rid of that tag.

  • On a sidenote movies did had movies tag and then they got rid of it. – Ankit Sharma Dec 13 '18 at 9:28
  • 1
    Not only Movies, Hinduism also black Listed Hindu tag and got rid of Sanatana Dharma tag. – Nog Shine Dec 13 '18 at 9:43
  • @NogShine having a tag which apply to almost every question make no sense – Ankit Sharma Dec 13 '18 at 9:48
  • Fun fact: There even is a dedicated type of filter for blacklisting such tags (“intrinsic tag”). I suppose we here do not have this one due to the renaming from Lego to Bricks. Moderators should be able to see it here. – Wrzlprmft Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
0

The word brick is not just generic for lego parts, it is also a type of part it self.

So yes, I think it should be kept incase people are asking a question regarding the type 'brick/s'.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .